OUGD504
Module Evaluation
Studio
brief one and two had very different outcomes. Both relied heavily on
understanding the content and consumer. Research was crucial in both. In studio
brief 1 I conducted a lot of research in production methods in order to make
the product as cost effective as possible. However, I had little interest in the
content of the book and relied on my client to provide the information. On the
other hand, I conducted research on content, production and client in studio
brief one as I already have an interest in the topic. I think the outcome of
studio brief two is more developed and successful in comparison to studio brief
one, which could benefit from more development. In the future, I will conduct
more research on content. In industry, I may work in similar situations where I
don’t have an interest in the subject matter but still want to produce an
engaging piece of design.
Both studio
briefs had a quick turnaround. This kept me motivated and I didn’t get
complacent. Although both outcomes require more development. For studio brief
one I would re-evaluate the stock I printed on and the material used for the
cover. For studio brief two I would test the app on the consumer and make
improvements from there.
Overall, I found
studio brief two much more engaging. I enjoyed using new software’s and
creating a working walkthrough. I found studio brief one rewarding as the
outcome produced a physical object, however, I found choosing and justifying
layouts and stock very dry.